This ban:
- Is temporary in nature (it has been extended until 2027).
- Includes exceptions, such as certain temporary residents or specific situations.
- Responds to its own legal and constitutional framework, which differs from the European one.
For this reason, although the Canadian case is often used as a reference in the international debate, it is not a model that can easily be transferred to Spain, especially due to the legal differences with the European Union.
United States: Trump’s proposal to limit home purchases by large investors
In the United States, the debate over access to housing has followed a different path from that of Europe. At the beginning of 2026, former president Donald Trump announced his intention to ban large companies and investment funds from purchasing single-family homes, as part of his proposal to curb rising housing prices.
Unlike what has been discussed in Spain or Canada, this proposal does not target foreign non-resident buyers, but rather the type of buyer. The focus is on limiting the mass purchase of homes by large institutional investors, regardless of their nationality, when these transactions are intended for investment rather than as a primary residence.
According to what was announced, the measure would aim to:
- Reduce competition between large funds and individual buyers.
- Prevent the accumulation of single-family homes as financial assets.
- Facilitate access to housing for families and local residents.
It should be emphasized that, for now, this is a political proposal and not a regulation currently in force. To be implemented, it would need to follow the corresponding legislative process in the United States.
This approach reflects an increasingly present international trend: not so much banning home purchases by foreigners, but rather limiting purchases by large investors — a different strategy from the one debated in Spain regarding foreign non-residents.
What about the so-called “100% tax” on foreign buyers?
When discussing a ban on foreign non-residents buying property in Spain, the so-called “100% tax” is often mentioned. However, it is important to clarify what this proposal actually involves.
It is not a new tax currently in force, but rather a proposed tax measure aimed at discouraging property purchases by non-EU foreign non-residents. The idea would be to apply a tax surcharge equivalent to 100% of the property’s value at the time of purchase, which would significantly increase the cost of the transaction.